[0.0-3.7] Warning, do not watch this video unless you want to become a flatter.
[3.7-7.8] You say, yeah, right, but I guarantee you that you don't actually know what we believe.
[7.8-10.7] And if you let yourself watch to the end with an open mind,
[10.7-14.9] you'll find out that it's actually you that's been hanging on a belief system,
[14.9-17.6] on a religion as it relates to the globe.
[17.6-22.4] You'll also develop a newfound respect for this group of people that support this channel
[22.4-26.9] and who are so willing to be called stupid, so willing to be looked at as idiots
[27.0-29.6] for simply questioning the narrative of what they're being told.
[29.6-34.6] Because the reality is, no one becomes a flatterer by seeing the floating pancake.
[34.6-36.7] Yeah, we think that's ridiculous too.
[36.7-41.9] We become flatterer by studying and finding major errors in the heliocentric model
[41.9-48.2] and actively pursuing truth, which I guarantee you is harder than passively absorbing a lie.
[48.2-51.0] We probably actually know more about what you believe than you do.
[51.0-52.9] Remember, we used to be you.
[52.9-57.6] So trust me when I say that any objection that is currently or is about to arise in your mind,
[57.6-59.6] we've already dealt with ourselves.
[59.6-63.4] And if this thing was truly easily debunkable, none of us would still be flatterer.
[64.1-68.0] Have you not wondered why someone would believe in something so stupid as flat earth?
[68.0-69.9] Why people don't mind being called idiots?
[70.5-72.2] Maybe it's because it's not that stupid.
[72.2-74.4] Maybe someone wants you to think it's stupid.
[75.2-79.4] Maybe someone is working really hard behind the scenes to make you think that we believe in a
[79.4-83.4] square pancake flying through the solar system that you could just step off of and in the nothingness
[83.4-87.9] of space. But again, I assure you we think that's ridiculous too.
[87.9-90.2] Nor do we have anything to do with the flatterer society.
[90.2-94.1] I've attended and spoken at conferences all over the US and Canada and met thousands of
[94.1-95.5] flat earthers and not once.
[95.5-98.6] Never have I met someone associated with the flatterer society.
[98.6-102.5] That is an organization of half-truths and idiotic science.
[102.5-106.8] Okay, we are simply people in search of truth who hold empirical, measurable,
[106.8-112.8] repeatable science as well as ancient accounts on a higher level than mere theoretical mathematics.
[112.8-118.0] And last thing before I get going, I want you to know that they are banking on you not questioning
[118.0-122.8] this. They're opening to their god with a lowercase G that you do not look into this because they
[122.8-128.5] know if you do, you're going to have some major questions that unfortunately have no warm and fuzzy
[128.5-134.3] answers, which is why they've worked so hard to keep the flatterer, the perception of flatterer,
[134.9-137.8] as a theory that only morons could believe in.
[137.8-141.4] So sit back, relax, and I promise you will not regret it.
[149.2-153.6] As I mentioned earlier, it wasn't the words flatterer or the fact that the flatter
[153.6-158.6] theory has all the answers because it doesn't, and it certainly wasn't the social consequences
[158.6-163.4] that drew us in. But for most of us, it was the questioning of the globe model, which
[163.4-167.8] ultimately brought us to flatter earth. So here are some questions that reveal some things
[167.8-174.2] that I didn't even realize I believed in by believing in the globe. Why is it that even though
[174.2-179.6] the earth spins at a thousand miles an hour at the equator, goes around the sun at 66,000 miles per
[179.6-184.5] hour, which travels through the universe at half a million miles per hour, which is expanding
[184.5-190.2] it over a million miles per hour, are we able to take a picture of the sky on the same day every year
[190.2-197.2] and never see changes in the stars, even for thousands of years? Why does Elon must say...
[197.2-202.7] You can tell it's real because it looks so fake. That's because it does look fake. Look how the
[202.7-208.6] earth glitches out in the background, but the car doesn't. And see how the earth supposedly looks
[208.6-214.5] from the International Space Station, which is 240 miles up. However, this was taken from only 170
[215.0-221.8] miles. Do you see an issue here? It's just like the Red Bull Space Jump in the Mythbusters episode
[221.8-228.0] that used downward-facing fisheye lenses to create massive amounts of cursor, but the non-f fisheye
[228.0-233.8] lenses from the capsule on the cockpit show flat horizons, which concur perfectly with weather
[233.8-241.0] balloon footage more than 20 miles up. Which, by the way, 20 miles high is roughly the size of the
[241.0-247.0] bulge that should be in the state of Kansas due to it being 413 miles wide. Here's what 20
[247.0-252.6] miles up looks like. That would be a large bulge for something that is supposed to be flatter than a
[252.6-259.4] pancake. And by the way, Kansas is only the ninth-flat of state in the US. How many pieces of flat land
[259.4-265.8] does it take to make a ball? Why when we look at the stars in December, do we see the same stars that
[265.8-272.8] we see in June? We should be looking in two totally different directions. If ships sail over the
[272.8-277.4] curve of the earth, why are we able to bring them back into view with high-powered lenses as if
[277.4-285.4] they merely sailed past the horizon of the eye's angular resolution? Why are we able to see things
[285.4-291.2] over long distances, which according to the formula for a ball with circumference of 24,900 miles,
[291.2-297.0] should be thousands of feet below the curvature horizon. And now, with infrared technology,
[297.0-301.9] we are seeing things that should be miles below the horizon if we truly lived on a ball.
[304.0-310.2] If Aristosthenes proved the Earth was a ball thousands of years ago with an experiment using shadows,
[310.2-315.6] why do experts say that his results should actually be the same on a flat Earth with a smaller local
[315.6-324.6] sun? If the sun barely looks bigger than the other stars from Saturn, why is it able to completely
[324.6-329.4] light it up so that we can see it from Earth? And if something merely the size of the other stars can
[329.4-334.2] do that, why is the backside of Saturn not lit up by the billions of stars on the other side?
[334.2-337.2] And why are there dark sides to any objects in the solar system?
[339.0-345.3] If moonlight reflects the warm light of the sun, why is moonlight measurably cold? Why is it warmer
[345.4-350.6] in the shadows at night when it's the exact opposite of what we experience in the sunlight during the day?
[352.9-357.2] How is it possible that our positive atmosphere sticks to this ball right next to the negative
[357.2-362.6] vacuum of space without a barrier in between? How is it that people claim to see lights in the sky
[362.6-367.2] that are the International Space Station and other satellites when they do not have lights on them?
[367.2-371.5] And due to their supposed distance off the ground, the sun wouldn't have the ability to reflect
[371.5-375.4] light off them. Let alone the fact that I do not believe you could see a satellite, something
[375.4-380.9] the size of a pickup truck, 250 miles away, even if it was lit by the sun. That's like saying you
[380.9-386.7] could see a vehicle in Oklahoma City while standing in Dallas. How is it we supposedly went to the moon
[386.7-393.2] 50 years ago but now we can't leave low Earth orbit? Why are the pictures of Earth from space
[393.2-399.2] described as composite images using ground-based observations and Photoshop to fill in the gaps?
[401.5-405.0] Why was all the original moon footage and telemetry data destroyed?
[407.4-412.6] Why is NASA constantly getting caught on live feeds with men in the background of models,
[412.6-417.4] harnesses on the International Space Station and bubbles and scuba gear in space like they're filming
[417.4-424.8] spacewalks in a pool? Why is YouTube hiding true flat Earth content and promoting the ridiculous
[424.8-429.6] false perception of the floating pancake? You're dealing with all these conspiracy theorists on
[429.6-435.3] your platform. So the first way is by demoting low-quality content and promoting more authoritative
[435.3-441.4] content and the second is by providing more transparency for users. So we're introducing boxes
[441.4-446.8] that provide factual information at the top of results that have shown themselves to turn up
[446.8-452.0] a lot of information that can counterfactual such as searching for the Earth's flat on YouTube
[452.0-456.2] where you see a lot of. Your response is to put a box saying nope the Earth is not flat.
[456.3-462.6] Correct. Okay. And lastly if we are so sure about this spinning ball heliocentric model,
[462.6-467.6] why are experts saying things like this? So everything we know about the universe,
[468.2-472.3] what we're made of, galaxy, stars, planets, that's all right here.
[474.7-483.0] So according to this chart, we are 96% stupid. And just so you know, the globe side has complex
[483.0-488.2] answers to all these. But it's time you start evaluating evidence for yourself instead of simply
[488.2-493.3] accepting someone else's opinion of it. We all have the same evidence. It's your worldview and
[493.3-499.2] your perception of the source that determines your interpretation of that evidence. The experts are
[499.2-503.8] not any closer to the stars than you are. You have the ability to trust your senses and come up
[503.8-512.2] with conclusions for yourself. So what do flat Earthers believe? Well I'll caveat with we do not have
[512.2-517.4] it all figured out nor do we claim to. However we can prove that there are major issues with the
[517.4-522.1] globe model and that is why we are searching for other solutions and other models which can support
[522.1-529.6] the phenomena and science we repeatedly observe. Well this is the best representation I have so far.
[529.6-535.0] We believe the center of our motionless world is the North Pole and an explorer or traveler can
[535.0-539.8] still circumnavigate this world from east to west or west to east by performing clockwise or
[539.8-544.9] counterclockwise circles around the North Pole. Antarctica is not a continent at the bottom of
[544.9-550.0] the globe but rather a continental ice shelf and mountain range that acts as a shoreline that holds
[550.0-555.8] the waters in and potentially supports the dome above so no falling off the edge. The sun moon and
[555.8-562.2] stars are simply lights in the sky. They are smaller, closer, located inside the Earth's system.
[562.2-566.7] They are not objects floating through space that are similar to the Earth. They are part of the Earth
[566.7-571.8] so no comparing us to them. There are many things that people think disproved this model thus
[571.8-576.1] concluding they live on a ball and there's no way I can address all of them but here's some of
[576.1-581.8] the most common objections. People say that other planets are round but as I mentioned earlier
[581.8-587.0] we believe planets are just lights in the sky not places you can go. Simply wandering stars that
[587.0-593.8] are part of our system not outside it. Space as you think of it is a lie. People say there are no
[593.8-598.9] pictures of the edge. Well that's because of the tree of Antarctica that does not allow for
[598.9-604.9] private exploration beyond the 60th parallel. Upheld by the United Nations whose flag also
[604.9-611.0] happens to be the map of the flat Earth. People say sunsets disprove the flat Earth because
[611.0-615.8] we believe the sun stays at a constant height in the sky as it circles above our head which is true.
[616.4-621.9] However you'll notice on clear days with minimal humidity the missing water in the atmosphere
[621.9-627.1] allows you to see the sun shrink into the distance as it moves away. It appears to go down just
[627.1-630.9] like the lights in this hallway appear to go down. However if the lights in this hallway were
[630.9-636.6] considerably higher than the observer they would appear to shrink very little as they moved away
[636.6-641.9] and if we were to create some atmosphere magnification they could even appear to grow as they approach
[641.9-648.1] the horizon just as the sun does on humid days. And what about gravity? Well to put it plainly
[648.1-653.1] we don't believe in gravity. We believe things govern themselves based on density, buoyancy
[653.1-659.2] and the electromagnetic force. All three things that are measurable and provable. Gravity even though
[659.2-664.4] as sold as a law is actually just a theory and it's truly only needed to stick things to evolve
[664.4-669.8] or have that ball revolve around another ball. Newton himself had doubts about gravity and in fact
[669.8-675.5] it has never been proven to exist. There was an experiment performed in which gravity waves were
[675.5-679.4] supposedly detected from two black holes orbiting each other a billion light years away.
[680.2-685.6] Just for some perspective the sun is only eight light minutes away so multiply that distance by
[685.6-691.6] 65,000 to get a light year then multiply it by a billion then turn out the lights because they're
[691.6-697.2] black holes. They claim that everything in the universe gives off gravity waves including the moon
[697.2-701.0] yet they did not detect it from the moon they detected it from two black holes a billion
[701.0-706.6] light years away. They were supposedly distorting space time and the amount which they claimed to
[706.6-713.0] have detected this space time being distorted was less than the diameter of the nucleus of an atom.
[713.5-719.5] So please use your brains the next time you see NASA come up with a big discovery. Look how it's
[719.5-724.9] always accompanied with an artist rendering or an image instead of a picture just like this
[724.9-730.4] image of a black hole that they supposedly stitched together from multiple forms of data that
[730.4-737.0] just happens to look a lot like the cover of the sound garden album black hole sun. Now the big
[737.0-742.8] question why would somebody cover this up? Well because the forces of evil cannot rule the original
[742.8-747.9] creation the one created by God they have to create an artificial one a perception in order to
[747.9-753.8] remove the true God from the equation lifting themselves up to be gods and they do this by creating
[753.8-759.6] a false reality making people unknowingly exist in it thus controlling them making it possible
[759.6-767.1] for everyone including the 99.9% of people working NASA to unknowingly propagate the lie
[767.1-771.8] and that perception is so powerful it can make someone who is provably standing still
[772.6-777.0] tell you that they're spinning a thousand miles an hour and someone who is standing right side up
[777.0-782.9] tell you that they're actually upside down. Now I know you have more questions and we have the
[782.9-787.8] answers and even though your heart may feel like you're hearing truth I'm sure there are many
[787.8-792.9] objections that have arisen in your mind remember we used to be you we have already had to deal
[792.9-798.6] with those objections just don't let the projection of someone else's perception get in the way
[798.6-804.2] of your pursuit of truth if you do it only proves that you're under someone else's control
[804.2-809.5] I pray that you take this seriously because the stakes are high don't let anything get in the way
[809.5-813.7] of your pursuit of truth because the truth will set you free. God bless