Energy / Uzbekistan / SMRs / Rosatom / industrial firm power

Uzbekistan’s Second Nuclear-Plant Signal: SMR Ambition Before First Reactor Runs

Energy source-card graphic summarizing Uzbekistan's second nuclear plant signal and SMR readiness cautions.

The useful headline is not that Uzbekistan has approved, financed and selected a second nuclear plant. The source-backed headline is narrower: regional reporting says President Shavkat Mirziyoyev told an August 17 Khorezm investment-project event that Uzbekistan is undertaking extensive preparations for a second nuclear power plant, while the country’s first integrated nuclear project is still under construction.

That belongs in the Energy watch because the first Uzbek project is not only a conventional large-reactor story. Reporting and official context describe an integrated site combining two large VVER-1000 units with two 55-MW RITM-200N small modular reactors. In other words: the SMR/advanced-nuclear narrative is already moving through energy-security and industrial-development politics before an operating record exists.

What changed

Gazeta.uz and Times of Central Asia report that Mirziyoyev said preparations are underway for a second NPP. No site, capacity, timetable, cost or technology partner has been announced.

Official anchor

President.uz confirms the August 17 Khorezm project event and confirms the June 4 launch of construction of the first integrated NPP power unit with Russia and IAEA participation.

SMR relevance

The first project is reported to include two RITM-200N SMR units alongside two VVER-1000 units, making schedule, regulator, fuel and infrastructure readiness the real gates.

The factual anchors

Why it matters

Uzbekistan’s nuclear push is a clean example of what “firm power” demand looks like outside the North American data-centre debate. The public explanation is industrial: investors want reliable electricity, predictable prices and operating guarantees. That is the same basic pressure showing up in mines, ports, AI campuses and energy-intensive manufacturing elsewhere.

The disciplined read is that nuclear is being used as a state-development and investor-confidence tool before the first plant has proven construction schedule, regulatory capacity, fuel logistics, public-safety systems and operating performance. That does not make the plan fake. It means the proof has to move gate by gate.

What would confirm the story

Cautions

The second-plant statement is reported by Gazeta.uz and Times of Central Asia from the president’s August 17 remarks. The official President.uz event page captured today confirms the event and investment-project package, but I did not locate a separate official transcript/page containing the exact second-NPP sentence before publication.

Do not overclaim this as a construction start, procurement award, IAEA approval, financing close, technology selection, reactor licence or evidence that the first SMR units will hit their target dates. The first NPP is itself still a construction and infrastructure-readiness story.

Not investment advice: this source card is an infrastructure and evidence note. It is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold uranium miners, reactor vendors, fuel-cycle companies, utilities, nuclear-service firms, Russia-linked suppliers, data-centre power stocks or related securities.

Primary and reporting sources